Fatores associados à aquisição de Staphylococcus aureus resistentes à oxacilina (MRSA) em recém-nascidos de parto hospitalar / Factors associated with the acquisition of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in newborns

Na última década, Staphlylococcus aureus resistentes à meticilina não multidroga resistente (NM-MRSA) tem sido descrito como um importante agente de infecção de corrente sanguínea em nosso serviço. Este estudo de coorte prospectivo, realizado entre fevereiro de 2009 e janeiro de 2010 na unidade neonatal, avaliou 403 recém-nascidos (RN), suas 382 mães e 148 profissionais da área da saúde (PS). Duzentos e dezessete NB (54%), 187 mães (48%) e 87 PS (59%) foram colonizados por S. aureus (SA). A colonização por S. aureus resistente à meticilina (MRSA) foi maior entre RN (15%) do que entre mães (4.7%) e PS (3.4%). Embora a transmissão da mãe para seu RN tenha ocorrido, na maior parte dos casos, a mãe não foi a responsável pela colonização do RN. Houve dois padrões predominantes de polimorfismo do DNA por eletroforese em campo pulsado (PFGE) entre os RN, e algumas mães e PS foram colonizados por eles. Fatores estatisticamente associados com colonização por MRSA foram baixo nível de escolaridade materna (fator de risco - OR: 2.99; 95%CI: 1.10-8.07) e rinossinusite materna (fator protetor - OR: 0.33; 95%CI: 0.12-0.88). Entre os Rn que permaneceram hospitalizados mais do que 72 horas, o aleitamento materno foi protetor (OR: 0.22; 95%CI: 0.05-0.98). Todos os isolados foram NM-MRSA, portavam poucos fatores de virulência e Staphylococcal Cassete Chromossome mec (SCCmec) tipos IVa e IVd predominaram. Embora não tenham ocorrido casos de infecção, a transmissão nosocomial de MRSA claramente ocorreu na unidade neonatal e aponta para a necessidade de implementação de práticas de controle de infecção, como higienização das mãos para prevenção de infecção cruzada. Outras práticas de promoção à saúde, básicas, mas abrangentes, podem ser fundamentais, como educação e aleitamento materno.

In the last decade non-multiresistant methicillin-resistant S. aureus (NM-MRSA) has been described as an important agent in bloodstream infections in our hospital. This prospective cohort study, conducted from February 2009 through January 2010 in the neonatal unit, evaluated 403 newborns (NB), their 382 mothers and 148 health care workers (HCW). 217 NB (54%), 187 mothers (48%) and 87 HCW (59%) were colonized by S. aureus (SA). Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) colonization was greater among NB (15%) than mothers (4.7%) and HCW (3.4%). Although mother-to-NB transmission occurred, in most cases mothers were not responsible for NB colonization. There were two predominant PGFE patterns among the NB and some mothers and HCW became colonized by them. Factors significantly associated with MRSA carriage by NB were lower level of maternal schooling (risk factor: OR: 2.99; 95%CI: 1.10-8.07) and maternal rhinosinusitis (protective factor: OR: 0.33; 95%CI: 0.12-0.88). Among NB who remained hospitalized for more than 72 hours, breast feeding was protective (OR: 0.22; 95%CI: 0.05-0.98). All the isolates were NM-MRSA, carried few virulence factors and Staphylococcal Cassete Chromossome mec (SCCmec) types IVa and type IVd predominated. Although there were no cases of infection, nosocomial transmission of MRSA clearly occurred in the neonatal unit and this highlights the need for infection control practices such as hand hygiene to prevent cross-dissemination. Other healthcare practices, which are very basic but also ample in scope, may play a role, such as general education of women and breast feeding.

Colonization pressure as a risk factor for colonization by multiresistant Acinetobacter spp and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an intensive care unit

OBJECTIVE: To determine factors associated with colonization by carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and multiresistant Acinetobacter spp. METHODS: Surveillance cultures were collected from patients admitted to the intensive care unit at admission, on the third day after admission and weekly until discharge. The outcome was colonization by these pathogens. Two interventions were implemented: education and the introduction of alcohol rubs. Compliance with hand hygiene, colonization pressure, colonization at admission and risk factors for colonization were evaluated. RESULTS: The probability of becoming colonized increased during the study. The incidence density of colonization by carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa and multiresistant Acinetobacter spp. and colonization pressure were different between periods, increasing gradually throughout the study. The increase in colonization pressure was due to patients already colonized at admission. The APACHE II score, colonization pressure in the week before the outcome and male gender were independent risk factors for colonization. Every 1% increase in colonization pressure led to a 2% increase in the risk of being colonized. CONCLUSION: Colonization pressure is a risk factor for carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa and multiresistant Acinetobacter spp. colonization. When this pressure reaches critical levels, efforts primarily aimed at hand hygiene may not be sufficient to prevent transmission. .